Vulture had a great post this week that reviews the opening lines of 17 new books. I'm a speed-reader and I rarely remember the first lines of a novel but at the cinema, I find that the opening scene is crucial for establishing the tone and structure of the whole film. I was particularly annoyed, then, to miss the first few minutes of Danny Boyle's Steve Jobs biopic because the Curzon didn't show any adverts and the only visible employee, who was busy making soy lattes, assured me I had ten minutes before the film started. It's the first time I've been back to the Curzon since they ditched their weekend earlybird screenings, losing my custom and my goodwill, but I was tempted by a £5 screening on my day off today. They haven't won me back.
Steve Jobs focuses on the eponymous visionary and controversial Apple co-founder (played here by Michael Fassbender) at three crucial moments in his career. Three product launches, in fact: the Mac in 1984, the NeXT in 1988 and the iMac in 1998. We don't see the launches themselves; just Jobs's last-minute preparations with his head of marketing, Joanna Hoffman (Kate Winslet), and last-minute confrontations with the same three ghosts of Jobs past.
Although the structure is, necessarily, artificial, it works rather well, allowing you to dive back into Jobs's life and see his latest creation and whether he has changed (of course not!). Even if you didn't know that Aaron Sorkin wrote the screenplay, this would be immediately evident. The dialogue is extensive, fast-paced and sharp. As with The Social Network, which was also penned by Sorkin, there is a lot of tech speak and geekery, and a central character who has neither the time nor the inclination to explain himself to those who cannot keep up.
At each launch, Jobs talks with Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogan), who, each time, asks him to acknowledge the Apple II crew. Each time, Jobs refuses, frustrating his friend with his arrogance and single-mindedness. He is the ghost of Jobs present. Then there is John Sculley (Jeff Daniels), the ghost of Jobs past: his one-time boss and mentor, with whom he discusses his adoption and parentage. Later, of course, the two fall out.
The most interesting relationship is between Jobs and his daughter Lisa, the ghost of Jobs future. Her mother, Jobs's ex Chrisann (Katherine Waterston), brings Lisa to each launch. Each time she asks for more money. At the Mac event, he refuses to acknowledge her as his daughter but, backed into a corner with only a few minutes before he has to go on stage and swayed by her drawing on Mac Paint, he agrees to Chrisann's request. His relationship with Chrisann remains volatile throughout the film although he does begin to accept Lisa into his life and it is at these moments when the film is at its most emotional. Jobs doesn't become more likeable, but you get the sense that perhaps there is more to the man than the revered technology genius.
I enjoyed the film: Sorkin's script is very funny in places, although it's a distancing, not a warm, humour as we laugh at Jobs's tireless arrogance. He variously compares himself to a god-like figure, a Beatle, Einstein, Caesar and Alan Turing. "I don't want people to dislike me," he says. "I'm just indifferent to whether people dislike me." He describes the Mac launch as the second most significant event of the 20th century, after World War Two. His disdain for others — colleagues, family, customers — is always apparent.
This is not the stuff of sympathetic characters, but Fassbender's performance is very impressive. His Jobs is not pleasant but he is charismatic, passionate and compelling. The human touches are left to other characters, particularly Winslet's long-suffering Joanna, who stands by Jobs, encouraging him to do the right thing. "I'm the one who has to explain you to people," she complains. Sadder are his arguments with Woz, who tries to be a friend despite what has happened in business. "You can be decent and gifted at the same time," Woz argues. Jobs is unconvinced.
Ultimately, although Boyle's film is compelling and entertaining, I left the cinema feeling unsatisfied. For me, it just didn't have enough heart. That may be down to the subject, but Mark Zuckerberg, as portrayed in The Social Network, was no more sympathetic and yet that film is still moving and has an emotional core, perhaps because it allows you to get to know the central characters intimately enough to really care what happens to them. Jobs's, and thus Boyle's, single-minded focus on the products over the people creates a heavy air of detachment. Even the score often emulates the iconic Mac start-up sound.
Showing posts with label geekery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label geekery. Show all posts
13 November 2015
02 July 2013
California Dreamin'
After rolling my eyes through more Vince Vaughn and/or Owen Wilson movie trailers than I care to remember, I was surprised to find myself being charmed by the trailer for The Internship. Maybe not charmed enough to pay £13 to see it, but certainly enough to go to a free preview screening last night. I chuckled several times during the trailer and was worried that those moments were the only funny parts of the movie, but actually, it was perfectly harmless. Utterly predictable, of course, and by no means a great film, but entertaining enough.
Director Shawn Levy's film feels like a smattering of The Social Network, The Apprentice and even The Hunger Games, combined with a large dollop of Wedding Crashers — or any other Vince Vaughn and/or Owen Wilson movie you've ever seen. Our screwball heroes are Billy McMahon (Vaughn) and Nick Campbell (Wilson), a pair of great salesman who get laid off and, against all odds, manage to secure themselves internships at Google. Despite being unable to operate a web cam, or talk about things being "online" rather than "on the line."
Billy and Nick are clearly the wildcard candidates, and are about twice as old as the other interns and even than Lyle (Josh Brener), who is assigned to manage them and the other misfits on their team. You see, the internship is a series of projects or challenges, at the end of which, only the winning team will be offered jobs at Google. Derided by evil Brit Graham (Max Minghella, who also played an antagonist in The Social Network; what's next, Max? A Vested Pinterest: The Pinterest Story?), who picks all the Ivy Leaguers and hot girls for his team, and admires his reflection using his Android mirror app, dropping his ts like there's no tomorrow.
On Team Fogeys, meanwhile, we have the Asian genius/maniac (Tobit Raphael), the geek-chic-ier-than-thou brain (Dylan O'Brien), and the girl who's an expert of every imaginable online fetish but who has never had a boyfriend (Tiya Sircar). Their 23-year-old manager, Lyle, is essentially Harry Potter. They all resent the presence of the oldies, who have no coding skills to add to the challenges and who, despite being much better at sports than their team mates, don't know the rules of Quidditch, which, of course, turns out to be one of the challenges.
But is it possible that Billy and Nick's teammates might learn as much from our heroes as vice-versa? Is it possible that if they all just pool their skills and work together, they might defeat the Evil Brit and the others? Is it possible that Billy might also win the heart of Dana (Rose Byrne), a 30-year-old Google employee with no social life? I couldn't possibly say, but you don't exactly go to see this kind of film for the shocking plot twists. You don't really go for the great acting either, but as I said before, I did laugh more than the requisite number of times, even if it was more chuckling than ROFLing. There is, of course, as much laughing at the Google geeks as at our hapless luddites, and there are uncredited cameos a-plenty, from Goodman and Ferrell to Brin. In sum, this is good popcorn fodder, but you wouldn't be missing out if you waited until the movie's DVD or TV release.
Incidentally, if you are hoping for more of a real insight into how things work at Google, I would recommend I'm Feeling Lucky by Douglas Edwards, Google employee number 59. Because there is more to Google than nap pods, free food ("even if I order five bagels? Or seven?") and an in-house sauna.
On a final Google-related note, I dedicate this post to the memory of Google Reader. RIP. I've switched over to Feedly, which is a great alternative. I've also added a new Feedly button to this blog, in case you'd like to subscribe.
Director Shawn Levy's film feels like a smattering of The Social Network, The Apprentice and even The Hunger Games, combined with a large dollop of Wedding Crashers — or any other Vince Vaughn and/or Owen Wilson movie you've ever seen. Our screwball heroes are Billy McMahon (Vaughn) and Nick Campbell (Wilson), a pair of great salesman who get laid off and, against all odds, manage to secure themselves internships at Google. Despite being unable to operate a web cam, or talk about things being "online" rather than "on the line."
Billy and Nick are clearly the wildcard candidates, and are about twice as old as the other interns and even than Lyle (Josh Brener), who is assigned to manage them and the other misfits on their team. You see, the internship is a series of projects or challenges, at the end of which, only the winning team will be offered jobs at Google. Derided by evil Brit Graham (Max Minghella, who also played an antagonist in The Social Network; what's next, Max? A Vested Pinterest: The Pinterest Story?), who picks all the Ivy Leaguers and hot girls for his team, and admires his reflection using his Android mirror app, dropping his ts like there's no tomorrow.
On Team Fogeys, meanwhile, we have the Asian genius/maniac (Tobit Raphael), the geek-chic-ier-than-thou brain (Dylan O'Brien), and the girl who's an expert of every imaginable online fetish but who has never had a boyfriend (Tiya Sircar). Their 23-year-old manager, Lyle, is essentially Harry Potter. They all resent the presence of the oldies, who have no coding skills to add to the challenges and who, despite being much better at sports than their team mates, don't know the rules of Quidditch, which, of course, turns out to be one of the challenges.
But is it possible that Billy and Nick's teammates might learn as much from our heroes as vice-versa? Is it possible that if they all just pool their skills and work together, they might defeat the Evil Brit and the others? Is it possible that Billy might also win the heart of Dana (Rose Byrne), a 30-year-old Google employee with no social life? I couldn't possibly say, but you don't exactly go to see this kind of film for the shocking plot twists. You don't really go for the great acting either, but as I said before, I did laugh more than the requisite number of times, even if it was more chuckling than ROFLing. There is, of course, as much laughing at the Google geeks as at our hapless luddites, and there are uncredited cameos a-plenty, from Goodman and Ferrell to Brin. In sum, this is good popcorn fodder, but you wouldn't be missing out if you waited until the movie's DVD or TV release.
Incidentally, if you are hoping for more of a real insight into how things work at Google, I would recommend I'm Feeling Lucky by Douglas Edwards, Google employee number 59. Because there is more to Google than nap pods, free food ("even if I order five bagels? Or seven?") and an in-house sauna.
On a final Google-related note, I dedicate this post to the memory of Google Reader. RIP. I've switched over to Feedly, which is a great alternative. I've also added a new Feedly button to this blog, in case you'd like to subscribe.
01 April 2012
Marylebone in 8-Bit Splendour
When I was working out how to get to Brixton in the morning in the absence of the Victoria Line, I noticed that Google Maps has a really helpful new feature. Look how easy this makes it to navigate around Marylebone:
Who would have thought central London could look so green? Sadly, I don't think Google Maps' 8-bit feature will be sticking around too long. Ah, well. Happy April 1st, everyone!
![]() |
NoMaRo for the NES |
![]() |
8-bit Marylebone Station in StreetView mode |
Labels:
geekery,
London,
maps,
Marylebone,
UK
22 November 2011
Bex's Christmas Gift Guide: Guys
This is the second part in my mini-series of Christmas gift guides (part one is here and this is the third part). Today I'll be picking out some gift ideas for guys. NB: Some of these presents would work equally well for women (including me!) but as I don't plan to put together a unisex guide, I've included them here.
Out and about
1. Paul Smith cycling helmet. £60. If I were a boy and if I cycled, I would definitely want to wear this stylish helmet. In fact, it's cool enough to make me wish I were a cyclist—although not quite enough to make me wish I were a guy.
2. Digital photography course from London Photo Tours. Prices vary. London Photo Tours run a variety of short courses for making the most out of your digital SLR or even your digital compact (£90 for a four-hour session). Their sessions have small groups and involve practical photo shoots in central London locations.
3. Crema coffee maker from Bodum. £16. Give a man a macchiato and he'll be caffeinated for a few hours. Give him a French Press and a bag of Square Mile Coffee and he can caffeinate himself for years to come. The beans and/or a custom-designed KeepCup would make good gifts for someone who already possesses the power of coffee making.
4. Sloe gin from Sipsmith. £23.49. I had the pleasure of sampling Sipsmith's Pimm's-like Summer Cup at my college's ball earlier this year and it has encouraged me to try their gins too at some point. Not cheap, but worth it.
5. Alessi parrot corkscrew from the Conran Shop. £32. Yes, a corkscrew is a bit of a boring gift but this one is really funky. [I almost didn't include this product because of the bad typo in its name (as with the "guady" [sic] tin in the girls' list) but I do like it.]
Art, etc.
6. London type map from Bold and Noble. £43. If you love typography, maps, London or even Cambridge blue, you'll probably like this poster map. They now sell designs from a range of different cities and countries, including a New York City map (although I prefer Axis Maps' version of Manhattan).
7. Susan Bradley Fin bookend from Magma. £18.95. For the auteur, cinephile, francophone or poseur in your life. Susan Bradley also makes cool London-themed book ends and letter racks.
Geekery
8. Cross stitch moustache cufflinks from Hannah Zakari. £16. Thanks to Movember, many girlfriends, wives and children have come to fear the 11th month of the year. So why not buy these 'tache-stitched cufflinks and make a donation via the Movember website instead?
9. Romantic star projector from Infmetry. $22. Yes, this is probably aimed at kids but it's awesome! You can even programme it with your own location for a personalised star show. Seriously, even Clive Owen looks dodgy with a 'tache!
10. Moshi Moshi phone handset from the Conran Shop. £24.99. Sometimes, it can be really hard work holding your iPhone against your ear for long periods of time. Fortunately, this brightly coloured handset, based on 1950s designs, can be plugged into your iPhone or computer and acts as a speaker and microphone (it also works with Skype). If you think this is an overpriced iAccessory, check out this iTypewriter from Anthropologie; surprisingly, given its £698 price tag, it is currently out of stock.
Edit: Selfridges have just released their annual Christmas shopping voucher so you can get 10% off beauty, fragrance and wine (in store and online) and 20% off most other products. Woo hoo!
Out and about
1. Paul Smith cycling helmet. £60. If I were a boy and if I cycled, I would definitely want to wear this stylish helmet. In fact, it's cool enough to make me wish I were a cyclist—although not quite enough to make me wish I were a guy.
2. Digital photography course from London Photo Tours. Prices vary. London Photo Tours run a variety of short courses for making the most out of your digital SLR or even your digital compact (£90 for a four-hour session). Their sessions have small groups and involve practical photo shoots in central London locations.
3. Crema coffee maker from Bodum. £16. Give a man a macchiato and he'll be caffeinated for a few hours. Give him a French Press and a bag of Square Mile Coffee and he can caffeinate himself for years to come. The beans and/or a custom-designed KeepCup would make good gifts for someone who already possesses the power of coffee making.
4. Sloe gin from Sipsmith. £23.49. I had the pleasure of sampling Sipsmith's Pimm's-like Summer Cup at my college's ball earlier this year and it has encouraged me to try their gins too at some point. Not cheap, but worth it.
5. Alessi parrot corkscrew from the Conran Shop. £32. Yes, a corkscrew is a bit of a boring gift but this one is really funky. [I almost didn't include this product because of the bad typo in its name (as with the "guady" [sic] tin in the girls' list) but I do like it.]
Art, etc.
6. London type map from Bold and Noble. £43. If you love typography, maps, London or even Cambridge blue, you'll probably like this poster map. They now sell designs from a range of different cities and countries, including a New York City map (although I prefer Axis Maps' version of Manhattan).
7. Susan Bradley Fin bookend from Magma. £18.95. For the auteur, cinephile, francophone or poseur in your life. Susan Bradley also makes cool London-themed book ends and letter racks.
Geekery
8. Cross stitch moustache cufflinks from Hannah Zakari. £16. Thanks to Movember, many girlfriends, wives and children have come to fear the 11th month of the year. So why not buy these 'tache-stitched cufflinks and make a donation via the Movember website instead?
9. Romantic star projector from Infmetry. $22. Yes, this is probably aimed at kids but it's awesome! You can even programme it with your own location for a personalised star show. Seriously, even Clive Owen looks dodgy with a 'tache!
10. Moshi Moshi phone handset from the Conran Shop. £24.99. Sometimes, it can be really hard work holding your iPhone against your ear for long periods of time. Fortunately, this brightly coloured handset, based on 1950s designs, can be plugged into your iPhone or computer and acts as a speaker and microphone (it also works with Skype). If you think this is an overpriced iAccessory, check out this iTypewriter from Anthropologie; surprisingly, given its £698 price tag, it is currently out of stock.
Edit: Selfridges have just released their annual Christmas shopping voucher so you can get 10% off beauty, fragrance and wine (in store and online) and 20% off most other products. Woo hoo!
02 November 2011
Google Reader Round-Up
Even though I had been warned in advance, Google's confiscation of the social functionality in Google Reader earlier this week made me very sad, especially given it came with a design "upgrade" (and yes, "upgrade" in the sense of O2 "upgrades") that doesn't seem to work very well on my work computer.
I didn't share posts within Google Reader very often but it was a useful place for me to highlight blog posts that might be worth a read to the people following me on Reader without having to send an email or copy and paste the link into Twitter or Facebook. Now if you want to share posts in Reader, you have to do it via Google+ and although I have a G+ account, I rarely use it and I refuse to let Google manipulate me into doing so.
To try to compile some of the links I find from Reader in a single place, I thought I would start doing Google Reader round-ups on this blog from time to time. These aren't all posts I would have shared in Reader but they are all posts I find interesting, noteworthy or timely; some may be in-jokes. Here are the first batch:
- How to find your previously shared items in Google Reader (this only works if your shared items were public, which mine weren't)
- Five hidden London gems (Lounge Bohemia and Upstairs both sound great)
- 32 girly gift ideas from the Daily Candy editors (a good range of prices but everything is beautiful)
- Schedule for the food stalls on the newly opened King's Boulevard (today I had a slice of gorgeous, woodfire Margherita pizza from Homeslice; £3 for a big slice)
- Markets in everything: laser eye-colour changes (eek!)
- And finally... 32 witty comebacks (some of these are now hackneyed but I chuckled at others. 32 is clearly the number of the week: see above!)
04 December 2009
Listless in London
I'm in a list-making frame of mind--or maybe I'm just listless. Either way, it's too early to start compiling my favourite books, movies and songs of the year but it isn't too early to round-up my top 100 films of the decade (at least, Time Out have already done it). I worked this out by taking all of the films I've given 8/10 or higher on IMDb and removing any made before the Noughties. Of these, four were awarded 10/10, 16 got 9/10 and the rest 8/10. This gave me a list of about 120 films so I removed my 20 least favourites.
Some caveats:
Some caveats:
- Most films get 7 or 8/10 when I first see them. The reasons for this are explained here. I do subsequently update ratings over time and if I end up buying the DVD or downloading an 8/10 film and watching it often enough, it might get promoted to 9/10. Similarly, once my post-cinematic euphoria has worn off, I may decide that the film wasn't worthy of a 7/10 rating and demote it accordingly. However, I don't scour my IMDb ratings page very often and so most films have inaccurate ratings, especially the newest ones (2008 and 2009).
- I haven't seen enough films this decade to really have a worthwhile Top 100. I only had to take 20 films off my original list, which didn't require much deliberation or any agonising decisions--a sign of good list-making.
- I only got the cinema bug in 2008. Although I went to the cinema quite often as a student (2002-2006), I didn't see very many films in 2000-2002 and 2006-2008; the former cinematic drought is compensated for to some extent because these films are now quite often on TV or quite cheap to buy on DVD.
- Yes, I am a geek.
10/10
- Closer (2004/I)
- Mulholland Dr. (2001)
- The Dreamers (2003)
- The History Boys (2006)
9/10
- 21 Grams (2003)
- An Education (2009)
- Atonement (2007)
- Before Sunset (2004)
- Gran Torino (2008)
- Juno (2007)
- L'ennemi public n°1 (2008)
- Le scaphandre et le papillon (2007)
- Mean Creek (2004)
- Ocean's Eleven (2001)
- Sin City (2005)
- Slumdog Millionaire (2008)
- The Dark Knight (2008)
- The Departed (2006)
- The Pianist (2002)
- The Prestige (2006)
8/10
- 2 Days in Paris (2007)
- A Cock and Bull Story (2005)
- A Scanner Darkly (2006)
- Almost Famous (2000)
- American Psycho (2000)
- Away We Go (2009)
- Babel (2006)
- Bandits (2001)
- Bright Star (2009)
- Brokeback Mountain (2005)
- Burn After Reading (2008)
- Catch Me If You Can (2002)
- Changeling (2008)
- Children of Men (2006)
- Cidade de Deus (2002)
- Crash (2004/I)
- Easy Virtue (2008)
- El maquinista (2004)
- Entre les murs (2008)
- Far from Heaven (2002)
- Final Destination (2000)
- Frost/Nixon (2008)
- Gangs of New York (2002)
- Genova (2008)
- Ghost World (2001)
- Gladiator (2000)
- Glorious 39 (2009)
- Good Night, and Good Luck. (2005)
- Gosford Park (2001)
- Hotel Rwanda (2004)
- Igby Goes Down (2002)
- In Search of a Midnight Kiss (2007)
- Jeux d'enfants (2003)
- Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003)
- L'instinct de mort (2008)
- L'ultimo bacio (2001)
- Les chansons d'amour (2007)
- Little Miss Sunshine (2006)
- Lost in Translation (2003)
- Mean Girls (2004)
- Memento (2000)
- Milk (2008/I)
- Million Dollar Baby (2004)
- Moon (2009)
- Mystic River (2003)
- Ne le dis à personne (2006)
- Paris, je t'aime (2006)
- Pour elle (2008)
- Public Enemies (2009)
- Revolutionary Road (2008)
- Saved! (2004)
- Scary Movie (2000)
- Se, jie (2007)
- Shrek (2001)
- Sideways (2004)
- Sounds Like Teen Spirit (2008)
- Spellbound (2002/I)
- Star Trek (2009)
- State and Main (2000)
- State of Play (2009)
- Sunshine Cleaning (2008)
- Super Size Me (2004)
- Swimming Pool (2003)
- Team America: World Police (2004)
- Thank You for Smoking (2005)
- The Beach (2000/I)
- The Boys Are Back (2009)
- The Hole (2001)
- The Hurt Locker (2008)
- The Informant! (2009)
- The Notebook (2004)
- The Reader (2008)
- The Rules of Attraction (2002)
- The Ten (2007)
- The Visitor (2007/I)
- There Will Be Blood (2007)
- Un secret (2007)
- V for Vendetta (2005)
- Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008)
- Watchmen (2009)
As this Top 100 wasn't as satisfying as I'd hoped, I decided to make a Top 10 as well. This wasn't too difficult either because the films had to consist of all of those I rated 10/10 and six of the 9/10 films--otherwise, it would make a mockery of my whole rating system. To avoid such a shocking inconsistency, I only looked at the 10/10 and 9/10 films and the Top 10 is thus:
- Mulholland Dr.
- Closer
- The Dreamers
- The History Boys
- Before Sunset
- Juno
- Gran Torino
- L'ennemi public n°1
- Le scaphandre et le papillon
- Ocean's Eleven
With as many as three comedies and two French films (both with Mathieu Amalric; coincidence? Je crois pas) and only one film starring Clive Owen, I don't feel this Top 10 accurately represents my favourite films of the decade. As this still wasn't enough analysis and as I can now include vlookup in my Magicke Excell Skillz, I decided to compare my list with Time Out's Top 101 and:
- 16 of my choices appear on Time Out's list
- In addition to this, I've watch 19 other films from the list (37 in total)
- Of those 37, I hated three (Dancer in the Dark, Amélie, and Punch-Drunk Love),
- Four would have made my Top 150 (Zodiac, In the Loop, Best in Show, and In Bruges) and
- I felt two were too repetitive: when you only have 101 films to play with, why not pick just one Haneke film and one instalment of Lord of the Rings (because they'd already signed up Peter Jackson to comment, perhaps?)
Thankfully, perhaps, this is no easy way for me to compile my Top 100 books of the decade...so I shall refrain.
Labels:
Clive Owen,
geekery,
lists,
movies
09 April 2008
...Nor Can You Always Get What You Want, Except When You Can
It had been a while (about a year, I think, for Babel) since I had been to the crappy, Nowheresville shopping centre that contains the non-arts cinema in town. I hadn't exactly missed the place - The Arts is a much nicer experience all round, not least because it does crêpes and class in equal measures (actually, it does crêpes better but they do have a French chef, so this isn't a bad thing). We used to avoid the place when possible, except when a film was on one of the big screens and even then, it was a pain because there is no assigned seating - like the time we went to see The Matrix Reloaded and were sitting in the back row, the aircon was broken and it was obscenely hot. The things we do for Keanu (who is currently ballsing up the remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still, I hear, and ruining Christmas to boot, given it's out two weeks before)...
So, what tempted me over to the multiplex? Well, 21, actually, which tells the "inspired by a true story - kind of, with a stretch of the imagination" of a bunch of MIT students, led by rogue maths professor, Kevin Spacey, who hit Vegas with their awesome Rain Man skills to become card counters who win big but have big oh-noes when bitter, soon-to-be-replaced-by-a-biometric-computer casino "loss preventer," Morpheus (I mean, Cole Williams) starts getting suspicious.
This is explains the ubiquity of recent blog posts explaining how the Monty Hall problem works; I first read about it on Predictably Irrational, where you can play along but the Tierney Lab blog on the NY Times blogs has covered it more extensively.
21 doesn't really have anything to do with this problem, other than the fact that it - like card-counting - is a way that maths can be fun and can be useful in the real world! Kevin Spacey is Micky Rosa, who is a most unrealistic maths professor given that a) he's pretty outgoing and funny, b) he relates the topics he is teaching to the real world and c) he talks about a quiz show in class. Spotting that Ben Campbell is one smart student, he gets Ben to play along in an imaginary round of the Monty Hall problem (three doors, one with a car behind, the other two with goats, the host knows where the car is. Contestant picks a door. Host opens one of the others to reveal a goat and then offers contestant the chance to switch - should she?), and of course Ben succeeds and explains why in suitably geschliegen language. Oh, and Ben also got 97% in his senior year "variable change" course at MIT, just in case you think Prof Spacey is just going on Ben's ability to do well in a quiz show!
If Micky Rosa isn't a very convincing maths professor, then Jim Sturgess doesn't portray a very convincing geek in Ben Campbell. He's too attractive, for a start (in a way reminiscent of Green Eyes, and his voice sounds the same as GE's too, although Sturgess is English so the accent must have been faked). He's also way too confident for someone who isn't supposed to be terribly self-confident - the actor appears far more comfortable later on when Ben comes out of his shell. When we meet Ben, he's chatting with some Harvard prof about his application to Harvard Med School and also for this really prestigious scholarship worth $300,000, for which 76 people apply for one place. Ben's very clever, we learn, but also very geeky and his only extra-curric involves building a self-driving car with his friends, Geekier and Geekiest. Harvard Prof tells him he has to dazzle, and as Ben has no dough for med school (and nor, apparently, does any form of financial aid appear to exist to allow gifted geeks like our hero to attend Harvard regardless of their financial situation - most odd), dazzling is the only solution.
But Ben has fun! He, G-er and G-est go out for beers on his 21st birthday with his Mom and they watch the frat boys socialise with real live girls. Mom tells Benji he's working too hard what with school and the self-driving car and his job at a tailor's shop in Cambridge. Ben's like, "you're right, Mom, but I gotta dazzle." Then, in the library one day, some arrogant, preppy bastard approaches him and commands that Ben follow him. Because he is all beta and geeky, he agrees. Sure enough Prepster leads him to a dark room where Prof Spacey is dealing some cards with Jill, the object of Ben's affections (and the "prettiest girl at MIT" - nice neg, Ben!), and some other kids. They want him to join their card-counting team and fly out to Vegas with them each weekend to make more money than he'd ever dreamed of (Hahvahd Med School! Oooh! And Hot Babe alert...overload....overload...aborting!). It's easy to count cards, they tell him, and he's clearly borderline autistic and so will be great at it. He considers but then says no.
Then, Hot Babe 9.467 shows up at the tailor's and tries to twist Ben's arm. She strokes his ego and tries to tempt him with her tales of the fun they all have and also by putting a tie on him; he's not convinced, although we know he will join in the end. HB9.467 is played by Kate Bosworth, who annoys me. Her voice was surprisingly deep in the film; I always assume that she sounds like a bimbo because I saw her on Jonathan Ross a couple of years back and she was a frickin' idiot and couldn't even answer the simplest of questions. Her IMDb bio suggests she's pretty smart but she's more famous for her heterochromia and her on-off relationship with Legolas. The heterochromia must cause problems when you're trying to dress up as different people in different casinos but no one seems to pick up on this.
So, welcome to the team, Ben, and off they fly to Vegas! It's a bit overwhelming at first. The students play as a team with the girls (whom Prof Spacey doesn't trust to be the Big Players) and an Asian guy sitting at tables, quietly counting and placing small bets, while Prepster and Ben are the Big Players, who pick up the agreed body language cues from the others to determine how well a particular table is doing. They also have a special code where certain words represent the numbers from one to whatever so that the non-big-players can indicate the Count to the Big Players (e.g. sweet = 16; "Oh, gosh, this drink's too sweet!").
So, they do well. They do great! Ben's a star and Prepster doesn't like it; he used to be the shit but now Ben's stealing his thunder and making him look bad. Also, Ben's still having problems kiss-closing HB9.467, although they're bonding well, but otherwise, things are good and when he returns to the dorm, he hides a big wodge of cash behind a loose panel in his ceiling. Also, Mom tries to give him a cheque for $68k but Ben feels guilty because he made $20k that weekend so lies and tells her he won The Only Scholarship/Financial Aid at HMS.
It's all a bit boring back at MIT and he can't be bothered with the self-driving car much, any more, though he and G-er and G-est go out to a bar that probably should have been the Miracle of Science. They start rating girls out of ten, to three decimal places and discuss whether or not they previously agreed to round up. Then in walks HB9.467 and she's surrounded by jocks; Ben surprises G-er and G-est by going right over to her and buying her a drink, clearing away the jocks. They bond over fathers on the T but then - oh noes! - Ben moves in for the kiss-close and gets burned big-time
Nor is Ben's new lifestyle all it's cracked up to be, of course, and the money soon starts to have an effect on Ben's wants, needs, actions and desires. Big money corrupts. Obviously, Prof Spacey isn't exactly the perfect, fatherly mentor, either, as Ben soon learns. Worse, Morpheus and his "loss prevention" colleagues, desperately trying to prove to casino bosses that they can't be replaced by computers that can scan biometric information, are closing in on the MIT men (and women). Ben is oblivious, though! He loves the disguises, the thrills, the gals...it's a fun life, if you can get it, but does HB9.467 really want the slick, confident, winner he has become or does she really want the self-conscious but incredibly clever geek who was actually pretty interesting and funny and sweet and whom she fell for? And has Ben lost his sense of what is important and what shouldn't be prioritised?
Well, 21 isn't the greatest film I've seen all year but it was pretty entertaining, nonetheless - it always catches me unawares when I go to the cinema and actually laugh; not out loud, in this case, but there were some good lines. The acting was OK and the script was decent enough. Visually, it was as glitzy and impressive as most other movies set in and around casinos, the snow in Hahvahd Yahd starkly contrasting with the happy punters frolicking in one of the hotel pools in Vegas. The soundtrack was quite good too, with You Can't Always Get What You Want playing out over the credits (although in the case of this film, it was more a case of "you can't always get what you want but only because you've lost sight of what you really want somewhere along the way").
I have found the whole co-evolving arms race between the card counters and the casino owners quite interesting since I saw a documentary on the MIT card counters on Horizon a few years ago, and of course, there's a lot more out there on the subject. Whether 21 did a good enough job of putting off poor students from trying the card-counting scheme is another matter - the casinos were more than happy to let the producers shoot the movie in their casinos (no such thing as bad publicity) and it was good to see the Hard Rock again, after its last appearance in The O.C.
Who wouldn't be tempted by all that money and all that glamour? HB9.467 liked the fact that in Vegas, you could be whoever you wanted to be (rather like Ryan in The O.C.) - the buzz must have been her motivation given that the clothes she wore back in Cambridge were really quite hideous compared to her Vegas attire, but that was probably just to emphasise the massive excitement and mystique of the double life. Of course, she's still pretty - not to mention more real - when she plays her MIT alter-ego. One other mystery was that the competition for which Ben, G-er and G-est were creating their self-driving car was called something like a "2 09" event. The only immediate things thrown up by Google was 2:09 Events, which can't be right, and a robot from Robocop, the ED-209, which is possible if too tenuous; perhaps this is just another maths joke I'm missing. Shame.
So, what tempted me over to the multiplex? Well, 21, actually, which tells the "inspired by a true story - kind of, with a stretch of the imagination" of a bunch of MIT students, led by rogue maths professor, Kevin Spacey, who hit Vegas with their awesome Rain Man skills to become card counters who win big but have big oh-noes when bitter, soon-to-be-replaced-by-a-biometric-computer casino "loss preventer," Morpheus (I mean, Cole Williams) starts getting suspicious.
This is explains the ubiquity of recent blog posts explaining how the Monty Hall problem works; I first read about it on Predictably Irrational, where you can play along but the Tierney Lab blog on the NY Times blogs has covered it more extensively.
21 doesn't really have anything to do with this problem, other than the fact that it - like card-counting - is a way that maths can be fun and can be useful in the real world! Kevin Spacey is Micky Rosa, who is a most unrealistic maths professor given that a) he's pretty outgoing and funny, b) he relates the topics he is teaching to the real world and c) he talks about a quiz show in class. Spotting that Ben Campbell is one smart student, he gets Ben to play along in an imaginary round of the Monty Hall problem (three doors, one with a car behind, the other two with goats, the host knows where the car is. Contestant picks a door. Host opens one of the others to reveal a goat and then offers contestant the chance to switch - should she?), and of course Ben succeeds and explains why in suitably geschliegen language. Oh, and Ben also got 97% in his senior year "variable change" course at MIT, just in case you think Prof Spacey is just going on Ben's ability to do well in a quiz show!
If Micky Rosa isn't a very convincing maths professor, then Jim Sturgess doesn't portray a very convincing geek in Ben Campbell. He's too attractive, for a start (in a way reminiscent of Green Eyes, and his voice sounds the same as GE's too, although Sturgess is English so the accent must have been faked). He's also way too confident for someone who isn't supposed to be terribly self-confident - the actor appears far more comfortable later on when Ben comes out of his shell. When we meet Ben, he's chatting with some Harvard prof about his application to Harvard Med School and also for this really prestigious scholarship worth $300,000, for which 76 people apply for one place. Ben's very clever, we learn, but also very geeky and his only extra-curric involves building a self-driving car with his friends, Geekier and Geekiest. Harvard Prof tells him he has to dazzle, and as Ben has no dough for med school (and nor, apparently, does any form of financial aid appear to exist to allow gifted geeks like our hero to attend Harvard regardless of their financial situation - most odd), dazzling is the only solution.
But Ben has fun! He, G-er and G-est go out for beers on his 21st birthday with his Mom and they watch the frat boys socialise with real live girls. Mom tells Benji he's working too hard what with school and the self-driving car and his job at a tailor's shop in Cambridge. Ben's like, "you're right, Mom, but I gotta dazzle." Then, in the library one day, some arrogant, preppy bastard approaches him and commands that Ben follow him. Because he is all beta and geeky, he agrees. Sure enough Prepster leads him to a dark room where Prof Spacey is dealing some cards with Jill, the object of Ben's affections (and the "prettiest girl at MIT" - nice neg, Ben!), and some other kids. They want him to join their card-counting team and fly out to Vegas with them each weekend to make more money than he'd ever dreamed of (Hahvahd Med School! Oooh! And Hot Babe alert...overload....overload...aborting!). It's easy to count cards, they tell him, and he's clearly borderline autistic and so will be great at it. He considers but then says no.
Then, Hot Babe 9.467 shows up at the tailor's and tries to twist Ben's arm. She strokes his ego and tries to tempt him with her tales of the fun they all have and also by putting a tie on him; he's not convinced, although we know he will join in the end. HB9.467 is played by Kate Bosworth, who annoys me. Her voice was surprisingly deep in the film; I always assume that she sounds like a bimbo because I saw her on Jonathan Ross a couple of years back and she was a frickin' idiot and couldn't even answer the simplest of questions. Her IMDb bio suggests she's pretty smart but she's more famous for her heterochromia and her on-off relationship with Legolas. The heterochromia must cause problems when you're trying to dress up as different people in different casinos but no one seems to pick up on this.
So, welcome to the team, Ben, and off they fly to Vegas! It's a bit overwhelming at first. The students play as a team with the girls (whom Prof Spacey doesn't trust to be the Big Players) and an Asian guy sitting at tables, quietly counting and placing small bets, while Prepster and Ben are the Big Players, who pick up the agreed body language cues from the others to determine how well a particular table is doing. They also have a special code where certain words represent the numbers from one to whatever so that the non-big-players can indicate the Count to the Big Players (e.g. sweet = 16; "Oh, gosh, this drink's too sweet!").
So, they do well. They do great! Ben's a star and Prepster doesn't like it; he used to be the shit but now Ben's stealing his thunder and making him look bad. Also, Ben's still having problems kiss-closing HB9.467, although they're bonding well, but otherwise, things are good and when he returns to the dorm, he hides a big wodge of cash behind a loose panel in his ceiling. Also, Mom tries to give him a cheque for $68k but Ben feels guilty because he made $20k that weekend so lies and tells her he won The Only Scholarship/Financial Aid at HMS.
It's all a bit boring back at MIT and he can't be bothered with the self-driving car much, any more, though he and G-er and G-est go out to a bar that probably should have been the Miracle of Science. They start rating girls out of ten, to three decimal places and discuss whether or not they previously agreed to round up. Then in walks HB9.467 and she's surrounded by jocks; Ben surprises G-er and G-est by going right over to her and buying her a drink, clearing away the jocks. They bond over fathers on the T but then - oh noes! - Ben moves in for the kiss-close and gets burned big-time
Nor is Ben's new lifestyle all it's cracked up to be, of course, and the money soon starts to have an effect on Ben's wants, needs, actions and desires. Big money corrupts. Obviously, Prof Spacey isn't exactly the perfect, fatherly mentor, either, as Ben soon learns. Worse, Morpheus and his "loss prevention" colleagues, desperately trying to prove to casino bosses that they can't be replaced by computers that can scan biometric information, are closing in on the MIT men (and women). Ben is oblivious, though! He loves the disguises, the thrills, the gals...it's a fun life, if you can get it, but does HB9.467 really want the slick, confident, winner he has become or does she really want the self-conscious but incredibly clever geek who was actually pretty interesting and funny and sweet and whom she fell for? And has Ben lost his sense of what is important and what shouldn't be prioritised?
Well, 21 isn't the greatest film I've seen all year but it was pretty entertaining, nonetheless - it always catches me unawares when I go to the cinema and actually laugh; not out loud, in this case, but there were some good lines. The acting was OK and the script was decent enough. Visually, it was as glitzy and impressive as most other movies set in and around casinos, the snow in Hahvahd Yahd starkly contrasting with the happy punters frolicking in one of the hotel pools in Vegas. The soundtrack was quite good too, with You Can't Always Get What You Want playing out over the credits (although in the case of this film, it was more a case of "you can't always get what you want but only because you've lost sight of what you really want somewhere along the way").
I have found the whole co-evolving arms race between the card counters and the casino owners quite interesting since I saw a documentary on the MIT card counters on Horizon a few years ago, and of course, there's a lot more out there on the subject. Whether 21 did a good enough job of putting off poor students from trying the card-counting scheme is another matter - the casinos were more than happy to let the producers shoot the movie in their casinos (no such thing as bad publicity) and it was good to see the Hard Rock again, after its last appearance in The O.C.
Who wouldn't be tempted by all that money and all that glamour? HB9.467 liked the fact that in Vegas, you could be whoever you wanted to be (rather like Ryan in The O.C.) - the buzz must have been her motivation given that the clothes she wore back in Cambridge were really quite hideous compared to her Vegas attire, but that was probably just to emphasise the massive excitement and mystique of the double life. Of course, she's still pretty - not to mention more real - when she plays her MIT alter-ego. One other mystery was that the competition for which Ben, G-er and G-est were creating their self-driving car was called something like a "2 09" event. The only immediate things thrown up by Google was 2:09 Events, which can't be right, and a robot from Robocop, the ED-209, which is possible if too tenuous; perhaps this is just another maths joke I'm missing. Shame.
05 January 2008
More WoTYs
So, further to Merriam Webster's bigging up of w00t as its word of the year for 2007, the American Dialect Society and the OED have also announced their own WoTYs; I don't like either of these as much as w00t.
The ADS picked subprime, "an adjective used to describe a risky or less than ideal loan, mortgage, or investment. Subprime was also winner of a brand-new 2007 category for real estate words, a category which reflects the preoccupation of the press and public for the past year with a deepening mortgage crisis."
Wow, that's such an exciting new word! The formation is boring, the etymology is boring and the meaning is boring. An all-round lexical loser, to my mind. I like one of the runners up better, which also won the "most creative" category: Googlegänger ("a person with your name who shows up when you google yourself.")
One of the runners up in the "most creative" category was lolcat. Fine, but hardly new, although I suppose 2007 was the year of the degeekification of the lolcat and the orly owl and the rest of the lolmenagerie.
Looking at some of the previous winners of the ADS's WoTY, I don't think they're very good at predicting words that are likely to remain in the lexicon, which are usually those that score highly on the FUDGE factor. This stands for: "Frequency of use" (broadly its popularity), "Unobtrusiveness" (disguised as something we already know about), "Diversity of users and situations" (whether it is used by people in lots of different situations), "Generation of other forms and meanings" (how fertile it is in creating derived forms), and "Endurance of the concept" (whether the thing it describes stays around so you need the word to describe it)."
In 1990, for example, the first WoTY of the ADS was the now obscure bushlips ("insincere political rhetoric"), although the most amazing (bungee jumping) and the most outrageous (politically correct) fared better. I liked 1996's most original prebuttal ("a preemptive rebuttal") but that appears not to have gone anywhere.
2002's prediction for the word most likely to succeed was pretty accurate too: blog. Not so much with 2006's WoTY: to be plutoed, to pluto ("to be demoted or devalued"). I like the idea here but to my knowledge, it hasn't really caught on (Google only turns up 19,000 hits, most of them probably relating to the word being WoTY).
Meanwhile, at the OED, locavore was proclaimed WoTY for 2007. According to the OUP blog, "[t]he “locavore” movement encourages consumers to buy from farmers’ markets or even to grow or pick their own food, arguing that fresh, local products are more nutritious and taste better. Locavores also shun supermarket offerings as an environmentally friendly measure, since shipping food over long distances often requires more fuel for transportation."
Hmm... None of the runners up were particularly inspired either - the backformation, to tase, for example, which Grammar Girl parodies nicely with her "Don't verbify me, bro!" t-shirts. As for cougar ("an older woman who romantically pursues younger men"), I've never heard of it but it sounds like a terrible idea.
The Oxford WoTY for 2006 was carbon neutral, which is still doing well and will probably only continue to spread as global climate change becomes an increasingly serious issue.
It's amazing how much attention these annual awards get each year. I guess that most of the nominees have particular cultural significance for the year in which they are nominated and as such, people relish the opportunity to hear a bit more about the history and formation of the words themselves as well as the concepts they embody.
The ADS picked subprime, "an adjective used to describe a risky or less than ideal loan, mortgage, or investment. Subprime was also winner of a brand-new 2007 category for real estate words, a category which reflects the preoccupation of the press and public for the past year with a deepening mortgage crisis."
Wow, that's such an exciting new word! The formation is boring, the etymology is boring and the meaning is boring. An all-round lexical loser, to my mind. I like one of the runners up better, which also won the "most creative" category: Googlegänger ("a person with your name who shows up when you google yourself.")
One of the runners up in the "most creative" category was lolcat. Fine, but hardly new, although I suppose 2007 was the year of the degeekification of the lolcat and the orly owl and the rest of the lolmenagerie.
Looking at some of the previous winners of the ADS's WoTY, I don't think they're very good at predicting words that are likely to remain in the lexicon, which are usually those that score highly on the FUDGE factor. This stands for: "Frequency of use" (broadly its popularity), "Unobtrusiveness" (disguised as something we already know about), "Diversity of users and situations" (whether it is used by people in lots of different situations), "Generation of other forms and meanings" (how fertile it is in creating derived forms), and "Endurance of the concept" (whether the thing it describes stays around so you need the word to describe it)."
In 1990, for example, the first WoTY of the ADS was the now obscure bushlips ("insincere political rhetoric"), although the most amazing (bungee jumping) and the most outrageous (politically correct) fared better. I liked 1996's most original prebuttal ("a preemptive rebuttal") but that appears not to have gone anywhere.
2002's prediction for the word most likely to succeed was pretty accurate too: blog. Not so much with 2006's WoTY: to be plutoed, to pluto ("to be demoted or devalued"). I like the idea here but to my knowledge, it hasn't really caught on (Google only turns up 19,000 hits, most of them probably relating to the word being WoTY).
Meanwhile, at the OED, locavore was proclaimed WoTY for 2007. According to the OUP blog, "[t]he “locavore” movement encourages consumers to buy from farmers’ markets or even to grow or pick their own food, arguing that fresh, local products are more nutritious and taste better. Locavores also shun supermarket offerings as an environmentally friendly measure, since shipping food over long distances often requires more fuel for transportation."
Hmm... None of the runners up were particularly inspired either - the backformation, to tase, for example, which Grammar Girl parodies nicely with her "Don't verbify me, bro!" t-shirts. As for cougar ("an older woman who romantically pursues younger men"), I've never heard of it but it sounds like a terrible idea.
The Oxford WoTY for 2006 was carbon neutral, which is still doing well and will probably only continue to spread as global climate change becomes an increasingly serious issue.
It's amazing how much attention these annual awards get each year. I guess that most of the nominees have particular cultural significance for the year in which they are nominated and as such, people relish the opportunity to hear a bit more about the history and formation of the words themselves as well as the concepts they embody.